MoveScore methodology

How MoveScore works

MoveScore is a transparent, deterministic decision-support tool. It turns the plan, inventory, estimates, and evidence you enter into an explainable 0–100 planning-risk score. Every factor below is published in full so you can see exactly how each point is earned. This is the same rule set the app runs—a regression test keeps this page and the scoring code in sync.

Rules version 1.011 factors · 100% total weight

What MoveScore is not

MoveScore is not a government rating, a safety certification, a prediction of what a mover will do, a guarantee of price or delivery, or a legal determination. A high score means the plan you entered looks more complete and lower-risk under these rules—it does not verify a company or promise an outcome. Licensing, insurance, and complaint history are never checked here; verify those directly with the appropriate regulator.

The factors

Weights total 100%. Missing inputs always fall to a low floor— absent data is never scored as favorable.

Plan completeness

12% weight
What it measures
Whether the five core planner fields are filled: origin, destination, move date, home size, and budget.
How it is scored
Share of the five fields provided, times 100.
When the input is missing
An empty plan scores low; blank fields never count as complete.
Confidence
High — every input is directly entered and checkable in the planner.
Source
Browser-saved move planner.

Inventory coverage

14% weight
What it measures
How many item records are marked to move.
How it is scored
Banded by count: 20+ items → 95, 10+ → 80, 5+ → 62, 1+ → 42.
When the input is missing
No inventory scores 10, not a favorable value.
Confidence
Medium at 10+ items, otherwise Low — this is a self-entered list, not a physical survey.
Source
Browser-saved inventory; no physical survey.

Estimate competition

10% weight
What it measures
How many written estimates are available to compare.
How it is scored
3+ estimates → 95, 2 → 78, 1 → 45.
When the input is missing
No estimates scores 10.
Confidence
High — a simple count of entered records.
Source
User-entered estimate records.

Pricing basis

10% weight
What it measures
Whether quotes use hard-to-verify cubic-foot pricing.
How it is scored
Starts at 100 and subtracts up to 70 for the share of quotes priced by cubic foot.
When the input is missing
With no estimates the factor scores 20, not a favorable value.
Confidence
High when estimates exist, otherwise Low. No tariff is validated.
Source
User-entered estimate terms; no tariff validation.

Deposit terms

10% weight
What it measures
The largest deposit entered, as a share of that quote's headline price.
How it is scored
Over 30% → 15, over 20% → 40, over 10% → 72, otherwise 95.
When the input is missing
With no estimates the factor scores 25, not a favorable value.
Confidence
High when estimates exist, otherwise Low.
Source
User-entered price and deposit amounts.

Price commitment

8% weight
What it measures
The share of estimates marked binding.
How it is scored
Share of binding estimates, times 100.
When the input is missing
With no estimates the factor scores 20.
Confidence
Medium — user classification; the signed contract text is not reviewed.
Source
User classification; contract text not reviewed.

Valuation clarity

8% weight
What it measures
The share of estimates showing full-value protection.
How it is scored
Share with full-value protection, times 100.
When the input is missing
With no estimates the factor scores 20.
Confidence
Medium — a user-entered selection, not a reviewed policy.
Source
User-entered valuation selection; no policy review.

Provider identity

8% weight
What it measures
Whether entered providers are identified as carriers rather than brokers.
How it is scored
35 plus up to 30 for the carrier share — capped at 65 because licensing is never verified here.
When the input is missing
With no providers entered the factor scores 15.
Confidence
Always Low — the role is user-entered and no live regulator lookup is performed.
Source
User-entered role only; no live regulator lookup.

Quote transparency

8% weight
What it measures
How many common contract or estimate warnings appear in the entered terms.
How it is scored
Starts at 95 and subtracts for the average number of warning flags per estimate, floored at 15.
When the input is missing
With no estimates the factor scores 20.
Confidence
Medium — deterministic flags on user-entered terms.
Source
Deterministic MoveVerity estimate rules.

Evidence readiness

6% weight
What it measures
Which evidence categories are registered: estimate, contract, inventory, and pre-move photos or video.
How it is scored
25 points per registered category, up to 100.
When the input is missing
No registered evidence scores 0.
Confidence
Medium — file metadata is registered, but source-file content is not reviewed.
Source
Local metadata register; source file content not reviewed.

Timeline readiness

6% weight
What it measures
How many days remain until the entered move date.
How it is scored
30+ days → 92, 14+ → 72, 7+ → 48, under 7 → 25, past date → 10.
When the input is missing
No valid move date scores 25.
Confidence
High when a move date is set, otherwise Low.
Source
Browser date and user-entered move date.

How the total is calculated

Each factor produces a 0–100 score. The overall MoveScore is the weighted average of those factor scores, using the weights above. Report confidence is reported separately and reflects how much of the underlying input coverage is present—a score built from little data is shown as low-confidence rather than quietly rounded up.

Limitations

  • No live licensing, insurance, complaint, market-price, traffic, weather, or capacity data is used.
  • A high score means the entered plan appears more complete and lower-risk under these rules; it does not guarantee provider quality or move outcome.
  • Scores change when browser-saved inputs change and should be reviewed with the underlying evidence.

Rules version history

When scoring rules change materially the version is bumped. Each score report carries the version that produced it, so past scores stay interpretable.

  • Version 1.02026-07-31

    Initial published methodology: 11 weighted factors summing to 100, each exposing score, weight, confidence, provenance, and a next action; licensing and other external signals labeled unverified.